Vic’s Review – “The Thing” (2011)


What’s it About?

This terrifying prequel to John Carpenter’s 1982 classic of the same name tells the story of a team of Norwegian scientists who find an alien ship frozen in Antarctica.

“The Thing”

Directed by Matthijs Van Heijiningen Jr.

7 out of 10

By Vic

As a standalone Sci-Fi creature feature The Thing would have played out as an average straight forward monster movie. But as a Prequel to one of the most highly regarded Sci-Fi/Horror films of all time, John Carpenter’s The Thing, the film fares better. Is it a love letter to Carpenter’s film? Yes. Is it almost a play by play of Carpenter’s film? Yes. But these little distractions aside the film plays out very well as a, if by the numbers, sci fi beastie film.

The set up is fast, interesting and straightforward. It begins, obviously, with the discovery of the alien saucer, the one we see in the beginning of JC’s movie, by Norwiegan explorers. The scene is a bit gripping as we see the vessel in near pristine condition. It answers the question of how it would have looked like pre-thermite. We then are introduced to Kate Lloyd, played rather convincingly and capably, by Mary Elizabeth Winstead (McClane’s Daughter in Live Free Die Hard). She agrees to help with investigation into the saucer discovery, Headed by a stern and aloof Professor.

The rest is rather predictable fare if anyone has seen Carpenter’s version. It almost plays out like a remake. They dig up and cart the remains of an alien life form back to the base, it thaws (the scientists in Hawks’ version had the brains to keep it in a cold room at least), it gets loose, tries to assimilate a camp member, it fails, they examine the remains, they take samples of the blood and determine that the alien is trying to imitate them in order to survive. The rest is where the film, much to it’s credit actually thrives, but only because it has Carpenter’s version as a template.

The suspense, paranoia and solid acting are all on display here and the characterizations are well fleshed out. We gravitate towards Joel Edgarton as the group pilot, Carter, whom we trust and like as he helps Kate take charge of the fearful and paranoid camp members. The creature effects are deep, dark and very weird. Yes, they are CGI but the shots never linger long and we get creeped out by the contorted and sinewy creatures that are spawned by the The Thing. Kate, obviously is the MacCready of the picture and she figures things out accordingly and does a good job of being the hero of the piece.

What I enjoyed the most in the film are all the references and connections to JC’s film. If you observe and watch with a keen eye all the pieces of the end of this film and Carpenter’s version come together nicely. Even as to where “The Axe” came from. The ending is a bit of a let down  but it is oblique and appropriate so I wasn’t as annoyed since they began to piece things together. All in all a decent homage to Carpenter’s visionary film and a nice and welcome companion piece to it. I recommend it to all fans and even non-fans (who may watch this one first then watch JC’s film) of Carpenter’s masterpiece.



  1. Good review here Vic. I haven’t seen this yet, but I have been keeping an eye out for Joel Edgerton’s work since the excellent Animal Kingdom.

  2. Awesome review Vic!! It’s hard to even compete with JC’s film but if it even got close, that’s impressive.

  3. Thanks Erik. Thanks Brian. I was surprised that the film captured the mood and suspense of Carpenter’s version. Not to the same extreme but it surpasses some of the more recent creature features we are exposed to. Look out for my review of Splinter which is a film very immersed in the spirit of The Thing.

    • Thanks, Paul! I thought the film was servicable. Is it the best alien film ever? No. Is it a good film for a rainy Saturday night? Hell yeah.

  4. I agree 100% with you on this one Vic. I was very much satisfied when I saw this in the theater. After I saw it I went home immediately to watch the original The Thing and the prequel was had a good transition. Especially, the Part at the end with the credits. The only thing I didn’t like is the fact that the Norwegians didn’t use the Thermite like in the video from the original. In the new one it is the ship that breaks up the ice. But eh, that’s a small thing. Great review!!

    • Yes! The Thermite issue gnawed at me for some time too. I kept hoping that we would actually see in person what Mac and the rest watched on video back at Outpost 31. It’s a small thing like you said but it still would have been cool. Small oversight, I guess. Glad you enjoyed the review, Dustin! Thanks for stopping by! 🙂

Sound off in The Den!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s